We are borg. We present the Lakota.

The Lakota People

In December of 2007 the Lakota Indians successfully succeeded from the United States, and went almost completely unnoticed within the realms of the United States. No U.S. press devoted their time or effort to reporting this cause, yet three different nations recognized the Lakota as independent from the U.S. They declared themselves to not be citizens of the U.S. and laid claims to the land which they owned in parts of Nebraska, South Dakota, North Dakota, Montana and Wyoming. They had been drafting this declaration stating their independence from the U.S. since 1974, and just now released it. This just shows how the media controls what the public hears.

Response 1: The Lakota people are completely justified in their actions. They were not satisfied with the actions of the United States government, and according Lockean philosophy, if a government is not protecting the rights of its constituency, then they have every right to rebel. In fact, he even claims that it is their duty to rebel in order to protect their rights. Now, in the United States Government, there are 2 checks that the people have on the government in order to assure that their individual rights are protected. These checks are: 1; the people are the ones who elect the officials into their offices. Thus the people can choose to not reelect an official if he or she fails to fully represent the voice of their constituency. 2: if the government fails to do their job properly, the people can rebel, and succeed from the nation. The rights of the Lakota people have been trampled on ever since the killing of Sitting Bull, and the Massacre at Wounded Knee. They have the obligation to ensure that their rights are protected, and if that means leaving the U.S. and creating their own country then so be it.

Response 2:The main purpose behind this notion, in relationship to our English 104 course is most obviously the power of the media expressed in this passage. This passage expresses that these Lakota Native Americans have been drafting their succession from the United States for over 30 years and the press just gave word. This is a dangerous lesson for our citizen's because, if the media is able to keep things under wraps for that long a period of time, what else are we unaware of that is occurring in our country? or even, what else are we unaware of that's occurring overseas? The war in Iraq is one that has been held in a negative light from day one, but still, the media doesn't provide the citizens of this country with full information. Many people of this country are still unaware of what we are even "fighting" for, which provides us with the scary realization that there could be far more corrupt actions going on in

Response 3:The Lakota Indians succeeding from the United States and being un-noticed by the media and general public shows two things; 1, the government must have not been taking care of its’ people must if the Indians were happy in the United States and how they were being treated then they would not have succeeded, and 2, either the media was told not to blow this story out of proportion because other Native Americans might follow suit, or they are not doing their job. The Lakota succeeding gives the feeling that the government has ignored them and has not treated them the way they wanted. The lack of Americans knowing of this succession shows how the news either reports on wars happening in far away lands or on local stories about a dog finding its owners. As Americans we need to know real news about what is happening within our country and the first way to do that is to tell the media what we want to hear.

Response 4: It is interesting how the Indians often get forgotten. Americans like to think of the United States as a virtuous country built on pure ideals, but no one ever remembers how we acquired this 'pure' land. Old treaties made, even if forgotten, still exist. If the Lakota community feels that the United States has not upheld their end of the contract, then they have every right to break away. Wouldn't it be strange if they did though? Can you imagine only 45 stars on the American flag? I think it is hard to imagine the US growing any more, and even harder to think of it getting smaller. I also wonder if there are similar treaties with other Indian tribes, and do those Native Americans also feel that the United States has not fulfilled its part of the agreement?

Resistance is futile...

Collective post.
War is over if you want it. + War Lore.
Happy Town + Levels of devistation.



After Derek leaves jail, he is a new man. This picture is highly representative of that and is a stark contrast to the photo of his arrest. He has a full head of hair (unlike a skin-head) and is wearing a white shirt (suggestive of a light, angelic nature) which covers the swastika he proudly displayed before. He is surrounded by family, all smiling, which suggests support for his new, more open attitude. (Technically, they don't know about it, but that is still what the picture suggests.)

Memes in Your Mind.

A sibling of the 'slogan' (which is used by corperations and political activists for getting the public's attention) is the 'meme' (used by prepubecent boys on the internet). The phrase "Don't taze me, bro!" is recognisable to anyone in America under 25. A nice definition of meme (nicer than the one I posted above anyways) is a unit of cultural information that represents a basic idea that can be transferred from one individual to another, and subjected to mutation, crossover and adaptation. The 'Don't taze me bro' meme has been used in many different applications, such as pictures, stories, and even Youtube techno videos.

Anything we want! (Tuesday, April 22)

I wanted to search for a light-hearted, or only semi serious cartoon or comic about war. Instead, I found this. I am a big fan of motivationals, and even more so of demotivationals.

According to The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Hubris means "Overbearing pride or presumption; arrogance". The word hubris in this poster is likely referring to the Bush Administration's lack of willingness to admit/explain that they were mistaken about the Iraq War.

Reading a Photograph (Tuesday, April 15th)

This image feels very geometric; the three cylindrical objects coming from three sides of the picture serve to equally space the dark and light values. I am unsure of what the metal cylinders are, perhaps rifles or the guns on three tanks. Either way, the point of view gives the viewer a sense of power: one tends to feel a lot safer behind the gun than in front of it. The lines of the picture remind me of the Japanese rising sun, which provides an interesting historical perspective considering that Japan was one of the America's enimys during WWII.

The War Between the States

http://www.civilwararchive.com/Unreghst/unpacav1.htm

These men are from the 3rd Pennsylvania Cavalry / 60th Regiment (Young's Kentucky Light Cavalry). Gray tone photographs often play up the visibility of light and dark. Seeing the light through the organic shape of the tree's leaves gives the sense of a bright, beautiful day. This in contrast to the main subjects of the photo, four civil war soldiers. They are carrying swords, and appear to be in uniforms. Behind them is an old style of tent, so this photo was likely taken next to their regiment's camp. The men are the obvious focus of the picture. They are facing the camera straight on, in somewhat similar poses, with the exception of the sitting figure. He is most likely in a different position because he is the Commander, Colonel William Averill, and the other men are his officer staff. The highest ranked person in a picture will often differentiate themselves in some way, by standing in the very middle, or placing themselves on a pedestal of some sort.

Teacher's Blog

http://104aboutwar.blogspot.com/